How to Protect Hemlocks in your Community
Releases of the Sasajiscymnus tsugae (aka Sasi or St) predator beetle in residential areas will have an impact on hemlocks across entire neighborhoods and communities! These highly mobile beetles will fly from tree to tree and lay eggs wherever they find Hemlock Woolly Adelgid ovisacs, leaving their eggs and larvae behind to feed on HWA concentrations, and develop into new adults. Meanwhile, the mature adults keep searching for new sites for feeding and egg-laying. Since many local residential properties will benefit from a beetle release, it makes good sense to get multiple owners involved in the process.
The good news is that you don’t need unanimity to protect community hemlock areas. Releases on one in five or even one in ten properties can provide good coverage over a residential area in several years time. And those doing the release will benefit first from the feeding activity of the predator beetles .
Getting municipal and county groups involved can greatly expand the scale and funding of predator beetle releases. And a local “green” group can also provide an effective organizational base for local beetle releases. So look to other groups that have either environmental or economic interests in preserving our native hemlock environments. Whether it’s a green community group, trout fishing club, local park or a land trust, all are candidates for active involvement in a community-based biological control effort for HWA. Remember that every participant added to your community biocontrol effort will multiply the scope of HWA control for hemlocks in the places where you live, work, and enjoy.
Sasi (Sasajiscymnus tsugae) Predator Beetles
Responding to a Hatch of HWA Nymphs…. Let’s Eat!
Procedures for a DIY Predator Beetle Release
With a little advance planning, a Sasi release can be as easy as one-two-three.
One: Get a map or plat of the area that you would like to protect. You don’t need anything fancy – an old survey plat or a printout from your county GIS records will do just fine. Then do a walk-about, mapping the hemlocks in your target area on this paper document.
Two: Take a closer look at the hemlock locations that you have identified, noting the number, size and health of the trees, as well as checking for the presence of white HWA ovisacs (which should be visible in the period from mid-October to mid-June). Now you have a map of potential beetle release sites.
Three: Decide how many beetles you want to release and pick the sites that will achieve best physical coverage of the area. Then divide the number of beetles by the number of sites to determine how many to release at each site. For practical purposes, this should not be below 25 beetles per site or 100 per release area. If it is, just reduce the number of release sites.
Finally, when your beetles arrive, put the beetles out on your hemlocks. For large trees without lower foliage, you can attach #4 coffee filters to the tree, as a temporary refuge. But if there is lower level foliage with HWA in reach, just apply the beetles directly to the branches with a cheery “Bon appetit”!
And if you don’t want to bother with a site survey, then just release all the beetles in one central hemlock location that has plenty of food present – to encourage beetle reproduction in that location. The predator beetles will do the scouting, site selection and distribution for you!
Getting HWA Predator Beetles Out in Your Community – An NC Case Study
One community organization that is well-positioned to help protect our native hemlocks from destruction is your local conservation land trust. Here in Western North Carolina, the Carolina Mountain Land Conservancy (CMLC) has taken the lead in initiating biological control efforts to protect both Eastern hemlocks (Tsuga canadensis) and Carolina hemlocks (Tsuga caroliniana) over a multi-county area. In 2012, CMLC Stewardship Director Julia Brockman initiated a program to release 900 predator beetles to help an old-growth Carolina hemlock colony on a recently acquired CMLC property – Weed Patch Mountain in Hickory Nut Gorge.
In 2013, her successor, Sarah Fraser, followed up on this biocontrol effort by releasing 1500 Sasi predator beetles on a larger Carolina hemlock colony, located on the same property. (See Weed Patch Mtn photos on Biological Control page.) And in 2014 Sarah extended CMLC’s HWA biological control efforts to include private owners of conservation easements in the Hickory Nut Gorge area, offering cost-share purchases for Sasjiscymnus tsugae predator beetles with releases provided by CMLC volunteers and staff. I have been happy to work with CMLC on several Carolina Hemlock outreach efforts to get predator beetles established along rock bluffs with hundreds of Carolina hemlocks (Tsuga caroliniana), distributed along the rock faces shown below.
This map shows the geographical scope of Carolina Mountain Land Conservancy’s outreach to protect and restore our native hemlock populations, resulting in the release of 20,000 HWA predator beetles on over 100 properties through 2016! Learn more about CMLC’s Hemlock Restoration Program.
This case study shows what a motivated environmental group can do to protect and restore our native hemlocks and their associated woodland, riparian and bluff-top ecosystems. But environmental motivation is not always enough to promote group action! Individuals can also play a role in this process with donations of time and funding in support of an HWA biological control effort!
Remember that hemlock restoration for all private hemlock areas in the eastern US is within our reach, but establishing predator beetles can only proceed one property at a time. And you are in a position to determine where and when this restoration occurs in your area!
A Caution on USDA Assessments of Predator Beetle Releases
In community release ventures there will often be some well-intended individual who wants to ask USDA, County Extension or Forest Service personnel about a private community predator beetle release. But unfortunately, USDA and USFS are mired in a failed research protocol fiasco which can lead them to misinform private property owners, as well as one another, about successful HWA control practices. (For more information on assessing HWA predator beetle releases, go to Assessment.)
Over the last ~15 years USDA/USFS have initiated HWA biological control strategies on public lands, including National Parks and Forests that have released millions of Sasi and other HWA predator beetles. USDA/USFS still advises private individual and community property-owners not to implement HWA biocontrol on hemlock areas, directing them instead to short-term neonicotinoid insecticide applications on individual trees. So what is the USDA environmental policy behind using long-term biological control strategies for HWA on public lands to protect entire areas of wild hemlocks, but recommending only short-term chemical controls for individual hemlock trees on private lands???
Chemical insecticides can certainly play a role in protecting larger trees while establishing a predator beetle population to protect an entire hemlock area. (See IPM page for information on combining chemical & biological strategies to control HWA on private properties.) But remember that only biological control of HWA can enable long-term hemlock restoration and recovery!
One possible source of USDA/USFS resistance to private biological control efforts is the use of a predator beetle assessment strategy that reports collecting low numbers of Sasi beetles in ground-level sampling efforts. However, it is important to note that this ground-level sampling assessment strategy had already proven to be ineffective for assessing another mobile predator beetle over 30 years ago – when it failed to detect the success of USDA releases of Harmonia axyridis (the Asian Lady Beetle)!
“During the late 1970s through the early 1980s, tens of thousands of multicolored Asian lady beetles were intentionally released by the U. S. Department of Agriculture’s Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS) in an effort to control insect pests that injure trees. The USDA-ARS coordinated the lady beetle releases in many southern and eastern states, including Ohio, Maine, Connecticut, Delaware, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Georgia, Mississippi, and Louisiana. … The USDA-ARS release program was eventually discontinued because failed recapture efforts suggested that the multicolored Asian lady beetle was not surviving in the United States.” Source: http://ohioline.osu.edu/hse-fact/1030.html (emphasis added)
But the failures that occurred in these releases did not involve failures in establishing populations of these highly mobile Asian origin predator beetles. Nor did they involve failures in these beetles’ effectiveness in controlling aphid populations on agricultural crops, as intended. Instead, the failure was in the “beetle capture” protocol in which ground-level sampling for these active adult beetles consistently failed to detect the increasing beetle populations for nearly a decade — at the same time as these Asian Ladybug beetles were swarming on human structures throughout release areas!
Not surviving in the US?
Science note: Any researcher can make the mistake of using an unreliable and/or nonvalid method the first time. But using such a method repeatedly, under conditions where its methodological failure has already been clearly demonstrated, is contrary to sound scientific practice.
The result of using such non-valid methods in a research effort is to replace scientific knowledge with ignorance, and this has lead USDA and the US Forest Service to promote ignorance-based policies and practices concerning HWA predator beetles.
Implications: Local sampling for insects is a time-honored entomological method that works well for many insects – where insect mobility is not a relevant variable. But the above-noted research failure shows that with a highly mobile predator beetle, such as Harmonia axyridis, this ground-level sampling method does not produce valid insect population information. Therefore, the practice of using ground-level sampling methods to assess population numbers for other highly mobile predator beetles, such as Sasjiscymnus tsugae, (which is also positively phototaxic – attracted to light and upper foliage areas), should be considered an exercise in futility. And this use of a non-valid assessment strategy, raises the specter of scientific malpractice on the part of USDA policy-makers.